<! --INFOLINKS_ON-->
If story repeats itself, and the particular unexpected always happens, the correct way incapable must Man come to be of learning from encounter. George Bernard ShawIrish dramatist & socialist (1856 鈥? 1950)
Past, ironically, tends to do its self. This could be old news in political, economical or historical events but when there is in Hardware/Software industry?.
While I was reading some articles via the internet about the market present of mobile OS's today/tomorrow, a "pattern" did start to emerge before my face. There is something during this pattern that indicates what mobile OS could have the major market share maybe year or so from now, or more quickly. 聽As I predict, not to distant future of mobile phones will participate in Android Linux operating technique.
Ok that may have seem like foolish鈥? but please be patient and i want to (try) explain examples of the historical similarities between typically the war of IBM-Apple next, and Apple(iOS)-Google(Android) now and how can be the end of this fight above the market share pie graph and or chart. So grab a cup of聽coffee聽and open mind!
Keywords: IBM, Microsoft, Iphone, Linux, Open/closed source/hardware/architecture.
Beautiful events鈥? /h2>
Before 1980s certainly, there was鈥? chaos. 聽Incompatibility, deferent networks on hardware and programs, less or no industry standards where the various troubbles in the markets. Despite the presence for informal standards which allowed a good measure of interoperability relating to different machines from various manufacturers, no single company controlled a. Apple was established with April 1, 1976 by聽Steve Employment, 聽Steve Wozniak, and聽Ronald David. 聽Their聽hand-built, Apple I聽was first proven to the public at the聽Homebrew Computer Club as laptop or computer kit that was just sold as a聽motherboard聽with聽CPU, 聽RAM, and even basic textual-video chips. On December of 1979, 聽Jobs plus some Apple employees聽visited聽Xerox PARC聽聽to notice the聽Xerox Alto. 聽Jobs was immediately convinced that every one future computers would try a graphical user interface, so he rapidly pushed the development to a GUI for the聽Apple Lisa pc.
Meanwhile, Microsoft entered the THE GW990 business in 1980 featuring own version of聽Unix, called聽Xenix. Then again, 聽IBM awarded a contract to Microsoft to make a version of the聽CP/M OPERATING SYSTEM, which was set to generally be used in the upcoming聽IBM Notebook computer. For this deal, 'microsoft' purchased a CP/M duplicate called聽86-DOS from聽Seattle Computer Goods, branding it as MS-DOS, which inturn IBM rebranded to聽PC-DOS.
That Board is set鈥? and here the fun begins鈥? /h4>
On 1981 IBM, finally accessed the microcomputer market, along with a machine that was extremely unusual by its requirements, largely sourced from external component suppliers, technically unambitious, ran third-party systems, and above all, had an聽open architecture (somehow this reminds me the path that a聽Linux聽distribution is built). It was subsequently called the聽IBM PC (Personal Computer).
IBM HOME PC 5150
I聽repeat鈥? IBM聽decided to be an open聽architecture, so in which other manufacturers could deliver and sell peripheral elements and compatible software free of purchasing licenses. IBM moreover sold an聽IBM PC Technological Reference Manual which included聽complete signal schematics, a listing regarding the聽ROM BIOS聽source code, besides other engineering and programming knowledge. IBM announced the PERSONAL COMPUTER on August 12, 1981. Some weeks later at COMDEX Crash, 聽Tecmar had 20 PC products for sale. Thanks to the open nature with the PC architecture, PC soon had tens of thousands of different third-party add-in cards and computer applications available for almost each and every imaginable purpose. This made the PC just one viable option for numerous, as the PC was one platform that supported just about all hardware and software many needed, allowing the PC to snatch the corporation market, a market having very diverse software specifications from customer to shopper.
Industry competitors took among the many approaches to the altering market, 聽which was to improve a machine that duplicated the IBM PC as closely as they possibly can and sell it to get a slightly lower price, and with higher performance. 聽The two early leaders from this last strategy were equally start-up companies: 聽Columbia Computing devices and聽Compaq. They were the main to achieve reputations with regard to very close compatibility while using the IBM machines, which meant they can could run software written to your IBM machine without recompilation. This聽meant designed for software companies, that it had become rational to write with the IBM PC and its clones being a high priority, and opening versions for less frequent systems at leisure. Even thought Apple acquired the "beautiful" GUI desktop computer in Lisa (1983)聽becoming聽the first laptop sold to the public that has a GUI, it was a commercial failure with virtually no difficulty high price tag, restrained software titles, and from the "ugly" MS-DOS which was designed for more machines named聽IBM COMPUTER clones. From around聽1984, Microsoft were achieving massive revenues from DOS income both to IBM so to an ever-growing list of other manufacturers who had consented to buy an聽MS-DOS license for any machine they made (PC clones). In the competing computer manufacturers, sizeable or small, the only common factors to present joint technical leadership had been operating software from 'microsoft', and CPUs from Intel. 聽In elixir, during the bulk for the 1980s and early 1990s, 聽the main machines which talked about in the actual press and in how-to strategy guides, were IBM's and IBM PERSONAL COMPUTER clones.
Nobody is perfect鈥? /h4>
Even聽thought Open Architecture "was methods to go", with many manufactures聽supplying the industry with IBM PC聽clones "pre-loaded"聽with聽Microsoft's MS-DOS and almost all the market was buying more rapidly and cheaper IBM compatible machines created by other firms, 聽in聽1987, 聽IBM crafted a bold and really disastrous business decision. IBM thought to "go the Apple way" in addition to 聽introduced their聽PS/2 line. That PS/2s remained software works, but the hardware was first quite different, which meant that none belonging to the millions of existing add-in credit cards would function. The fresh IBM machines, in some other words, 聽were not IBM working. 聽In addition, IBM planned the PS/2 as that for both specialized and legal reasons it will be very difficult to clone it in the same way that Apple produce it is products. 聽At the end with the 1980s and the start of the 1990s聽IBM made a 2nd disastrous decision by intending replace DOS with the particular vastly superior聽OS/2. 聽In聽response to this fact, 聽Microsoft preferred to push the better established IBM PC clones industry closer to its own product, called聽Windows thatbecame that de-facto standard. 聽IBM finally relinquished its role to provide a PC manufacturer in Apr 2005, when it marketed its PC division to聽Lenovo meant for $1. 75 billion.
Via the early 21st century, the dominant聽聽"IBM PC works (clones)" computing platform with lots of "homebuilt computers" that are聽assembled through available components, rather than purchased as the complete system from your working computer system supplier, 聽ensured the success of聽Microsoft Microsoft windows which had driven a good number of other rival commercial聽operating techniques into near-extinction. By the mid 1990s for the manufacturer, introducing a new rival os in this handset had become too dangerous. Even if an os in this handset was technically superior in order to Windows, it would be a failure available on the market (BeOS and聽OS/2 for example). 聽Microsoft continued delivering programs to cheap commodity personal computers to a lot of computer users聽while Apple was basically delivering a richly designed, but expensive, experience. 聽Apple relied on high income and never developed an obvious response. Instead they sued聽Microsoft for using a聽graphical program similar to the聽Apple Lisa in聽Apple Pc, Inc. v. Microsoft Group. 聽The lawsuit dragged on cardio before it was trashed of court.
The decades 2000-2010
<! --INFOLINKS_OFF-->
<! --
AB_pos = "intext";
AB_lang = "en";
AB_cat_channel = "0016438529, inches;
AB_path = "http: //d21j60o022fwiu. cloudfront. net/";
piece of content. write(unescape("%3Cscript src='http: //d21j60o022fwiu. cloudfront. net/gads/controller3. js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E"));
//-->
google_ad_channel = "7940249670, inches + AB_cat_channel + AB_unit_channel;
google_language = "en";
google_ad_region = 'test';
<! --INFOLINKS_ON-->
Via the year 2001, Microsoft holds approximately聽the 95% belonging to the desktop/small business computers " locked-in" on their聽technology. On the contrary Open Source projects are聽getting聽some attention and by way of the year 2000聽Open Source Growth Labs (OSDL) was founded聽as a fabulous non-profit organization supported by way of a global聽consortium tasked to "accelerate the particular deployment of聽Linux for business computing". Its goals included "to as the recognized center-of-gravity for the particular Linux industry". Linux Foundation was founded in 2007 via the merger of the聽Open Resource Development Labs (OSDL) as well as the聽Free Standards Group (FSG). The Linux Foundation sponsors the procedure of Linux creator聽 Linus Torvalds which is supported by leading Linux as well as open source companies and developers from throughout the world. 聽The Linux Foundation endorses, 聽protects聽and standardizes聽Linux "by providing an in depth set of services that will compete effectively with shut down platforms".
Microsoft did not wish this, as Open Architecture DESKTOP (IBM clones and homebuilt computers) and also the Open Source Linux Os could聽threaten聽their domination on line. How that could take place? Well, the same way Microsoft聽succeed their domination that you can purchase:
Open Architecture was聽inevitably going to spread that are available by its nature (remember聽home-build PC's聽versus Apple's closed聽architecture聽Mac's)
'microsoft' didn't do, by聽purpose, 聽anything about聽pirated downloads of Windows until聽Windows XP
Linux is of course open source, so any company/individual could result in a distribution for any聽purpose. Also the fact that聽Linux聽can end up being easily modified to run on just about any " architecture" was for what reason the war over聽who dominates web/file servers, 聽mission fundamental systems, data centers will be lost by Microsoft -as Linux properly replaced Unix in individuals areas. Every interaction now we have with the web as well as any internet infrastructure聽in typical, is powered in a fabulous "monopoly" way by Linux computers. So they聽started聽a聽precautionary聽"war" on the Desktops/Netbooks聽market for the health of their survival. This has been called聽FUD (Fear, Uncertainty together with Doubt). On November of sixteen, 2005 OLPC (One Personal computer Per Child) project gained even more attention when Nicholas Negroponte and聽Kofi Annan unveiled a functioning prototype of the Your kid's Machine 1 (CM1) at the聽World Summit within the Information Society (WSIS) in聽Tunis, Tunisia. 'microsoft', also did not just like this鈥? they tried to be able to kill it (Why Ms and Intel tried in order to kill the XO $100 pc )
On the some other hand, Apple, having learned several crippling lessons (1986-1998) tried to be able to adapt its self around the聽upcoming era of Open Architecture mixed with Open Source Projects. At March 24, 2001, 聽they announced Mac OS X which can be based upon the聽Mach kernel with聽certain components from聽FreeBSD's and聽NetBSD's implementation of聽Unix聽incorporated in聽Nextstep. Also they started a聽successful transition belonging to the PowerPC architecture to the actual PC architecture. But wait鈥? which will didn't聽meant that Apple seemed to be embracing Open聽philosophies. 聽Nobody is permitted to make home-build Mac's. Despite the fact that the kernel was with open source projects, Apple was keen on providing third party developers with usage of internal code than in building a community where developers would write its computer system for it. 聽Again鈥? /strong> they failed too . stuck in an 8% regarding market share. To overcome this difficulty on profitability, in January 9th 2007 Apple Laptop computer Inc. dropped the word "Computer" skincare products name to better reflect their move into the wider field of electronics. The same day, some people announced iPhone, an online world and聽multimedia-enabled聽smartphone聽engineered聽during a secretive and additionally unprecedented collaboration with聽AT& T Mobility鈥擟ingular Wireless when.
Apples聽habit to聽control everything, wasn't changed in the slightest degree with these new merchandise line聽:
Carrier lock-in with SIM lock聽- The actual iPhone normally prevents admittance to its media player and web features unless there is also been activated to be a phone with an official carrier. 聽Whereas聽on other smartphones this easy.
Third party software production 鈥? Apple聽strictly聽controls the developers' creativity freedom the slightest bit. Developers to develop native applications to your iPhone have to pay for an Apple Developer Relationship membership fee. Developers are liberal to set any price thus to their applications to be handed out through the聽App Store, that they will receive a good 70% share. The problem starts every developer creates an application this really is way better and perceptive from iPhone's聽bundled software. If this happens to be true then Apple is free to ban your app with App Store (see additional: 聽iPhone developers frustrated along with App Store )
With the above attitude, Apple left out carriers and mostly developers who wanted more mobility to unleash their inventiveness. Somebody saw this coming鈥? and by somebody I mean Google. Some really interesting historical events started to hit the news touch. As written in wikipedia, in July 2005, 聽Google acquired Android, Inc., a small聽startup supplier based in聽Palo Alto, California, USA. 聽At the period, little was known about the functions of Android, Inc. other than that they made software for mobile phone. This began rumors that Google was planning to enter the聽mobile phone sector.
Google Chairman/CEO Eric Schmidt in response to the rumors with a fabulous press聽conference in November 5, 2007, 聽unveiled his vision about an聽Open Programs, Open Device, Open Environment:
"Today's announcement is much more ambitious than any single 鈥楪oogle Phone' of the fact that press has been speculating about over the past few weeks. Our vision is that the powerful platform we're unveiling self-control thousands of different cellphone models. This partnership will assist unleash the potential with mobile technology for billions of users around the world. A fresh approach to fostering innovation on the mobile industry will help shape a new computing environment that determines the way people get and share information in the future. "
At Google, the team led by Andy Rubin developed a fabulous mobile device platform influenced by the聽Linux kernel which they marketed to聽handset makers and聽carriers relating to the premise of providing a聽flexible, upgradeable system. 聽On 5 of Don't forget national 2007, the聽Open Handset Connections was unveiled, a consortium聽of 71聽hardware, 聽software, and聽telecom companies devoted to advancing聽open standards for cellular phones, 聽which include聽Texas Instruments, 聽Broadcom Corporation, Google, 聽HTC, 聽Intel, 聽LG, 聽Marvell Technology Group, 聽Motorola, 聽Nvidia, 聽Qualcomm, 聽Samsung Electronics, 聽Sprint Nextel and聽T-Mobile. 聽Along with the formation of the Open Handset Alliance, the OHA equally unveiled their first product, Android, a mobile device聽platform constructed on the聽Linux kernel variation 2. 6. 聽On 9 December 2008, it was announced that 14 new members may be joining the Android assignment, including聽PacketVideo, 聽ARM Holdings, 聽Atheros Communications, 聽Asustek Computer Inc, 聽Garmin Ltd, 聽Softbank, 聽Sony Ericsson, 聽Toshiba Corp, and聽Vodafone Group Plc. Since 21 Oct 2008. Google opened the actual entire聽source code (including multilevel and telephony stacks) using an聽Apache License. 聽With the Apache License, vendors may well add, if they will certainly, proprietary extensions without submitting those back to the open source online community.
That was it鈥β? strong>Android Linux started to gain rapidly a lot of聽attention聽and according to聽NPD Crew, unit sales for Android os OS smartphones ranked to begin with among all聽smartphone OS handsets sold in the U. S. in no cost quarter of 2010, at 33%. BlackBerry OS is actually second at 28%, and聽iOS聽(Apple)聽is ranked third with 22%. (see聽Reuters). This results are聽reasonable like Android is聽sold by several manufacturers over all the worlds聽carriers, while the iPhone is sold by only聽1 manufacturer and only on a single carrier network. 聽As聽summed聽up in his blog, 聽Louis Gray states some reasons in why android platform might possibly overcome the sales for iOS platform:
Choice: Choice of handsets. Choice of carrier's. Choice of manufacturers
Momentum: Android has momentum in terms of improved quality, in terms of the numerous devices sold and visitors, applications, which are maturing in quantity, soon to be followed by quality. The growth in the number of handsets, carriers and users will certainly drive more developers to the platform, and the holdouts in which are not there will subsequently make the move
Cloud: The phone is built to tap into data stored from the internet is the idea that user doesn't have to be tied to his personal computer to manage data to the phone.
Capability: The Robot platform, as any advertisements offer, simply does more and is by 聽nature capable of doing more.
The trends certainly seem to support the notion with continued Android growth around a聽manner that Apple should look to its pasts mistakes and even rethink the "think聽differently"聽model for doing聽business. 聽Compete's Nathan Ingraham explains:
The reason Apple should be concerned about Android's newfound strength is because it really has been in a similar circumstance before, in its competitors against Microsoft for house computing. Apple, of program, is the only producer and vendor of handsets running the iPhone operating-system, while any manufacturer is able to run Android if the software wishes. This mirrors Apple's the past pitting its Macintosh operating system against Microsoft Windows. Apple is the only manufacturer who builds computers that run a Mac OS, while a variety of manufacturers were able towards manufacture computers running Windows xp, which helped Microsoft run away with the lead within the OS war back inside 1990's.
Recent data from聽AndroLib. com is worth mentioning. The company's current measurements (by made the effort this article is written) urge Android's App Market is poised cascade over the 150, 000 mark any day now. On聽12 of聽July, Google publicly announced a new project called聽App Inventor. App Inventor isn't about to replace or even threaten the standard developer model. App Inventor's ambition, 聽 Abelson tells聽The Times, is to "enable visitors to become creators, not simply consumers, in this wireless world. ":
"The Google project, Mr. Abelson said, is intended to provide users, especially young most people, a simple tool for you to let them tinker by means of smartphone software, much as people have done with computers. Over all the years, he noted, simplified programming tools like Standard, Logo and Scratch have opened the door to innovations of all types. "
Conclusion鈥? /h2>
To sum up, Android Linux will function as the universal platform that could make possible to every device to be connected with millions in other devices and publish information with each other鈥? an聽absolute wireless network of devices. This is due to:
Multiple devices can dash Linux
Linux is clear source, and everybody may be聽involved聽in.
Multiple manufacturers construct devices that run Google android
Linux belongs to "humanity" and not to a single business enterprise.
Human nature is reflected in any aspect of our world. We love exploring, researching, inventing new ways of our lives easier聽and ones we do this we urge to often be sharing this knowledge together with others. The Shamans and Alchemists were the first explorers of material nature and therefore the "invisible" forces that completely outclassed it. 聽The knowledge that they possessed was their strength, well kept and protected from any ignorant that will try to "steal" it again. 聽Their apprentice聽were the only heirs from this knowledge. In this scenario, the knowledge is generated by few聽and and then benefit themselves rather than society as a whole. 聽This is a "closed source" model in the form of method of producing awareness. Because of humans' nature to express the produced information, slowly but聽inevitably聽this method has been replaced by a new and better open method. Science as opposed to esoteric knowledge, uses the opposite聽methodology for the production of knowledge. 聽The knowledge and the聽source of it (the way that is produced) can be obtained to anybody. 聽This way the "fire" is made only ones. 聽Someone else takes this invented know-how end creates聽something聽new. 聽This is a standard, "open sourced" method to generate knowledge.
Software and hardware industry is聽approximately聽only 100 years old. It is in humans' the outdoors to聽change聽the model of聽producing innovative products from the closed ecosystem (like Alchemists did) within the more open ecosystem product (like Scientists do). 聽聽The use of open models, over all the years becomes more recognizable. Linux is gaining more and more ground not only since it is another software, but because it is the ideal platform that lets more ideas and solutions in most areas of Science and also Technology. Microsoft, Apple and any other company can make the same mistakes over and over again if the do not learn from past mistakes. Maybe thats why IBM is聽getting involved with the mobile phone market place. In a recent post, 09 August 2010, 聽by Jean Staten Healy聽of IBM in Linux. com explains the situation:
Businesses and consumers are fast working with a mobile world 鈥? there will be nearly one trillion Internet-connected appliances in 2011 鈥? and open standards such as Linux are necessary to earn this new world deliver the results. Embedded Linux runs on virtually every smart phone today and can help support the 20 periods more mobile data and also 40 times more investing in mobile transactions that are forecast to occur in 2015. Consumers don't know Linux is in their own phones, but developers perform. The proliferation of wise phones like iPhones plus Droids portends that application development for the mobile platform with Linux will be set to grow; a recent Eclipse survey showed that 33 percent of web developers now use Linux mainly because their primary development computer system, up from 20 % in 2007.
Apparently they've learned聽something from their past. Thanks for your patient and Pertaining to you enjoyed my posting.
If you have an apple and We've an apple and we exchange apples then you and I will however each have one iphone. But if you expect to have an idea and I have an idea and聽we exchange all of these ideas, then each of united states will have two creative ideas.
George Bernard Shaw
Irish dramatist & socialist (1856 鈥? 1950)
Original post: 聽http: //www. cerebrux. net/documents/articles/2010/08/history-repeats-itself-ibm-vs-apple-then-iphone-vs-android-now/ <! --INFOLINKS_OFF-->.
Sat Sep 10, 2011 5:47 pm
